PetitionLens
All decisions
SustainedEB-2 · Appeal

Polystyrene foam product manufacturer

Engineering · decided 2018-04-05 · NSC · APR052018_01B5203

Official PDF on uscis.gov

How each part of the test was decided

Read from the appeals office's own sentences by fixed rules, not from the Director's findings or the petitioner's arguments. Each result shows the sentence it came from. The official PDF controls.

  • Step 0Eligible for EB-2Not decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

  • Prong 1Merit and national importanceNot decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

  • Prong 2Well positioned to advance itNot decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

  • Prong 3Worth waiving the job offerNot decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

The decision in brief

Sentences picked out of the text automatically. Read them in context below; the official PDF controls.

What the AAO decided

Main reasons given

  • The Director also denied the petition tinding that the Petitioner had not established its ability to pay the proffered wage of $125,000 from the priority date of the petition, June 23, 2016, until the Beneficiary obtains lawful permanent residence. See in text
  • Alter a thorough review of the evidence, including materials submitted on appeaL we tind that the Petitioner has established its ability to pay the protTered wage, as required. See in text
Read the full decision (2 pages)

Objections found (0)

Automated tags. Each shows the sentence that triggered it.

No catalog objection was detected in the analysis section.

    Full decision

    OCR text from the official PDF, reformatted for reading. Scan errors carry over; the PDF controls.

    Highlighted: Outcome (2) AAO finding (2)Matter of X citation
    Decision header
    U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services · MATTER OF D-C-0-M-, LLC

    Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office DATE: APR. 5, 2018

    APPEAL OF NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER DECISION PETITION: FORM 1-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER The Petitioner, a polystyrene foam product manufacturer, seeks to employ the Beneficiary as an ERP lead. It requests classification of the Beneficiary as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree under the second preference immigration classification. Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 203(b)(2), 8 U.S.C. § 1152(b)(2). This "EB-2" classification allows a U.S. employer to sponsor a professional with an advanced degree for lawful permanent resident status.

    The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the Petitioner had not demonstrated its ability to pay the proffered wage. The Director also concluded that the record did not establish, as required, that the Beneficiary possessed the minimum education in the field of study required on the labor certification lor the proffered position.

    On appeal, the Petitioner submits a brief and additional evidence. The Petitioner asserts that the evidence is sufficient to establish its ability to pay to pay the proffered wage and establishes the Beneficiary has the minimum education required on the labor certification.

    Upon de novo review, we will sustain the appeal.

    To be eligible lor approval, a beneficiary must have all the education, trammg. and experience speci lied on the labor certification as of the petition's priority date, which is the date the underlying labor certification application was accepted tor processing by the Department of Labor (DOL). See 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(d); Mal/er ofWing·.\ Tea House, 16 I&N !58 (Acting Reg'! Comm'r 1977).

    Here the labor certification specifics that the position requires a minimum of a bachelor's degree in engineering, computer science, or any related field plus five years of experience. The Director denied the petition finding that the Beneficiary's field of study did meet the labor certification requirements. On appeaL the Petitioner contends that the Beneficiary's education is sutlicient to meet the minimum educational qualifications. After reviewing the materials submitted on appeal, we agree. The Beneficiary has the foreign equivalent degree of a U.S. bachelor's degree in engineering, computer science, or a related field, and therefore has the minimum education required by the terms orthe labor certification.

    Muller ofD-C-0-M-. LLC

    The Director also denied the petition tinding that the Petitioner had not established its ability to pay the proffered wage of $125,000 from the priority date of the petition, June 23, 2016, until the Beneficiary obtains lawful permanent residence. See 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2). On appeaL the Petitioner asserts that is has submitted sutlicient evidence to demonstrate its ability to pay the Beneficiary the proffered wage. Alter a thorough review of the evidence, including materials submitted on appeaL we tind that the Petitioner has established its ability to pay the protTered wage, as required.

    ORDER: The appeal is sustained.

    Cite as Matter ofD-C-OM-. LLC ID# 998111 (AAO Apr. 5, 2018)