PetitionLens
All decisions
SustainedEB-2 · Appeal

Electronic commerce company

Education · decided 2018-04-13 · NSC · APR132018_01B5203

Official PDF on uscis.gov

How each part of the test was decided

Read from the appeals office's own sentences by fixed rules, not from the Director's findings or the petitioner's arguments. Each result shows the sentence it came from. The official PDF controls.

  • Step 0Eligible for EB-2Not decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

  • Prong 1Merit and national importanceNot decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

  • Prong 2Well positioned to advance itNot decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

  • Prong 3Worth waiving the job offerNot decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

The decision in brief

Sentences picked out of the text automatically. Read them in context below; the official PDF controls.

What the AAO decided

Main reasons given

  • Here, although 1-1.14 contains language in addition to the standard Kellogg language, we find that the additional language does not add any additional meaning that would allow for anything less than an advanced degree. See in text
Read the full decision (2 pages)

Objections found (0)

Automated tags. Each shows the sentence that triggered it.

No catalog objection was detected in the analysis section.

    Full decision

    OCR text from the official PDF, reformatted for reading. Scan errors carry over; the PDF controls.

    Highlighted: Outcome (2) AAO finding (1)Matter of X citation
    Decision header
    U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services · MATTER OF A-C- LLC · Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office · DATE: APR. 13,2018 · APPEAL OF NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER DECISION · PETITION: FORM 1-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER

    The Petitioner, an electronic commerce company, seeks to employ the Beneficiary as a senior project manager. It requests classification of the Beneficiary as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree under the second preference immigrant classification. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 203(b)(2), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2). This EB-2 employment-based immigrant classification allows a U.S. employer to sponsor a professional with an advanced degree for lawful permanent resident status.

    The Acting Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the petition and a subsequent motion, concluding that the labor certification did not require a professional holding an advanced degree or the equivalent. On appeal, the Petitioner asserts that the terms of the labor certification require a professional hold[ng an advanced degree.

    Upon de novo review, we will sustain the appeal.

    In order to be eligible for EB-2 classification, the job offer portion of the labor certification must demonstrate that the job requires a professional holding an advanced degree or the equivalent. 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(4)(i). The regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2) defines "advanced degree" as a master's degree or a bachelor's degree followed by five years of progressive experience. If the labor certification allows for less .than an advanced degree, the position will not qualit)' for EB-2 classification.

    The Director concluded that the terms of the labor certification do not support EB-2 classification because the labor certification stated minimum requirements in part H.l4 that are less than an advanced degree. Part 1-1.14 states that the Petitioner is "willing to accept any suitable combination of education, experience and/or training that is equivalent to the actual minimum requirements of the position and shows demonstrable ability in the skill sets required for the position." This The Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals (BALCA) held in Francis Kellogg. 1994-INA-465 and 544, 1995-INA 68 (BALCA Feb. 2, 1998) (en bane). thai "'where [the beneficiary] does not meet the primary job requirements, but only potentially qualifies for the job because the employer has chosen to list alternative job requirements, the employer's language in italics, although in different word order, is known as Kellogg language.

    Maller ofA-C- LLC

    We generally do not interpret the.Kel/ogg language to mean that the employer would accept lesser qualifications than the stated primary and alternative requirements on the labor certification. Here, although 1-1.14 contains language in addition to the standard Kellogg language, we find that the additional language does not add any additional meaning that would allow for anything less than an advanced degree. The language indicates that any suitable combination of education and experience is allowed only if it is equivalent to the actual minimum requirements stated on the labor certification Therefore, the position offered meets the minimum requirements for EB-2 classi tication.

    ORDER: The appeal is sustained.

    Cite as Ma11er ofA-C- LLC, ID# 1179671 (AAO Apr. 13, 2018) alternative requirements are unlawfully tailored to the [beneficiary's] qualifications ... unless the employer has indicated that applicants with any suitable combination o f education, training or experience are acceptable."

    The actual minimum requirements o f the labor certification include a master's degree and 24 months o f experience, or a bachelor's degree and five years o f experience.