The Petitioner, a software consulting company, seeks to employ the Beneficiary as a security analyst. It requests classification of the Beneficiary as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree under the second preference immigrant category. Immigration arid Nationality Act (the Act) section 203(b)(2), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2). The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the petition. The matter is now before us on appeal. Upon review, we will summarily dismiss the appeal.
An officer to whom an appeal is taken shall summarily dismiss any appeal when the party concerned fails to identify specilically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(l)(v).
The statement the Petitioner submitted in support of the appeal does not specifically identify an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the decision being appealed. On the Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, the Petitioner stated that a brief or additional evidence would be submitted within 30 days of tiling. However, we have not received anything further from the Petitioner to date. Because the Petitioner has not identified any specific, erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the Director's decision below, the appeal must be summarily dismissed.
ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § I03.3(a)(l )(v). Cite as Maller ofR-Inc., ID# 1282324 (AAO Apr. 16, 2018)