PetitionLens
All decisions
SustainedEB-2 · Appeal

Developer of inspection and telemetry systems

Computing, AI & data · decided 2016-04-22 · NSC · APR222016_04B5203

Official PDF on uscis.gov

Decided under the old NYSDOT test, replaced by Matter of Dhanasar on Dec 27, 2016. Useful for background only.

How each part of the test was decided

Read from the appeals office's own sentences by fixed rules, not from the Director's findings or the petitioner's arguments. Each result shows the sentence it came from. The official PDF controls.

  • Step 0Eligible for EB-2Not decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

The decision in brief

Sentences picked out of the text automatically. Read them in context below; the official PDF controls.

What the AAO decided

Read the full decision (1 page)

Objections found (0)

Automated tags. Each shows the sentence that triggered it.

No catalog objection was detected in the analysis section.

    Full decision

    OCR text from the official PDF, reformatted for reading. Scan errors carry over; the PDF controls.

    Highlighted: Outcome (2)Matter of X citation
    Decision header
    MATTER OF M-T- CORP. · Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office · DATE: APR. 22,2016 · APPEAL OF NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER DECISION · PETITION: FORM I-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER

    The Petitioner, a developer of inspection and telemetry systems, seeks to pem1anently employ the Beneficiary as a senior embedded software engineer. It requests classification of the Beneficiary as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree under the second preference immigrant classification. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 203(b)(2)(A), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2)(A). This classification allows a U.S. employer to sponsor a professional with an advanced degree to obtain lawful permanent resident status.

    The Director, Nebraska Service Center, denied the petition on July 3 L 2015. The Director concluded that the record did not establish the Beneficiary's qualifying education for the requested classification and the offered position.

    The matter is now before us on appeal. The Petitioner asserts that the Director erred m his conclusions. We will sustain the appeal.

    Upon consideration of the entire record, including evidence submitted on appeal and in response to our notice of intent to dismiss of March 8, 2016, the record establishes the Beneficiary's qualifying education for the requested classification and the offered position as specified on the accompanying labor certification. We will therefore withdraw the Director's decision and sustain the appeal. The record further establishes the eligibility of the Petitioner and the Beneficiary for the requested benefit. We will therefore also approve the petition.

    ORDER: The appeal is sustained.

    Cite as Matter ofM-T- Corp., ID# 15993 (AAO Apr. 22, 2016)