PetitionLens
All decisions
DismissedEB-2 · Motion

Physical therapy service

Other / unclear · decided 2016-12-22 · NSC · DEC222016_01B5203

Official PDF on uscis.gov

Decided under the old NYSDOT test, replaced by Matter of Dhanasar on Dec 27, 2016. Useful for background only.

How each part of the test was decided

Read from the appeals office's own sentences by fixed rules, not from the Director's findings or the petitioner's arguments. Each result shows the sentence it came from. The official PDF controls.

  • Step 0Eligible for EB-2Not decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

The decision in brief

Sentences picked out of the text automatically. Read them in context below; the official PDF controls.

What the AAO decided

  • ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(l)(v). See in text
Read the full decision (1 page)

Objections found (0)

Automated tags. Each shows the sentence that triggered it.

No catalog objection was detected in the analysis section.

    Full decision

    OCR text from the official PDF, reformatted for reading. Scan errors carry over; the PDF controls.

    Highlighted: Outcome (1)Matter of X citation
    Decision header
    U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services · MATTER OF C-R-PT, P.C. · Non-Precedent Decision of the . Administrative Appeals Office · DATE: DEC. 22,2016 · MOTION ON ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS OFFICE DECISION · PETITION: FORM I-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER

    The Petitioner, a physical therapy service, seeks to classifY the beneficiary as an immigrant under Section 203(b)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), and employ the beneficiary permanently in the United States as a physical therapist. See Section 203(b )(2) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2).

    The Director, Nebraska Service Center, denied the petition. The matter is now before us on appeal. Upon review, we will summarily dismiss the appeal.

    An officer to whom an appeal is taken shall summarily dismiss any appeal when the party concerned fails to identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(l)(v). On the Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, the Petitioner stated that a brief or additional evidence would be submitted within 30 days of filing. However, we have not received anything further from the Petitioner to date. Because the Petitioner has not identified any specific, erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the Director's decision below, the appeal must be summarily dismissed.

    The burden of proof in these proceedings rests solely with the Petitioner. Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1361. The Petitioner has not satisfied that burden and the appeal will be summarily dismissed.

    ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(l)(v).

    Cite as Matter ofC-R-PT, P.C., ID# 263307 (AAO Dec. 22, 2016)