Degree or an Alien of Exceptional Ability Pursuant to Section 203(b )(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8
U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2)
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER:
SELF-REPRESENTED
INSTRUCTIONS :
Enclosed please find the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) in your case. This is a non-precedent decision. The AAO does not announce new constructions of law nor establish agency policy through non-precedent decisions. If you believe the AAO incorrectly applied current law or policy to your case or if you seek to present new facts for consideration, you may file a motion to reconsider or a motion to reopen, respectively . Any motion must be filed on a Notice of Appeal or Motion (Form I-290B) within 33 days of the date of this decision. Please review the Form I-290B instructions at http://www.uscis.gov/forms for the latest information on fee, filing location, and other requirements. See also 8 C.P.R.§ 103.5. Do not file a motion directly with the AAO.
Thank you,
)J D udnciu
D Ron Rosenberg
"\ ~ Chief, Administrative Appeals Office www.uscis.gov
NON-PRECEDENT DECISION
DISCUSSION: The Director, Texas Service Center, denied the immigrant visa petition and the matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. 1 The appeal will be summarily dismissed.
The petitioner seeks classification pursuant to section 203(b )(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2), as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. The petitioner asserts that an exemption from the requirement of a job offer, and thus of a labor certification, is in the national interest of the United States. The director found that the petitioner had not established that an exemption from the requirement of a job offer would be in the national interest of the United States.
In Part 2 of the Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, the petitioner checked box "A" indicating "My brief and/or additional evidence is attached." Therefore, the appellate submission constitutes the entire appeal. Part 3 of the Form I-290B includes a space to "[p]rovide a statement explaining any erroneous conclusion of law or fact in the decision being appealed." The petitioner states: "Please see attached documents." The petitioner, however , did not submit a brief or other documentation in support of the appeal.
The petitioner's appellate submission fails to identify any erroneous conclusion of law or fact in the director's decision. The petitioner does not specifically challenge any of the director's findings or point to specific errors in the director's analyses of the documentary evidence. In addition, the petitioner does not explain how the specific documentation that she submitted supports a finding of eligibility.
As stated in 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(l)(v), an appeal shall be summarily dismissed if the party concerned fails to identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. The petitioner has not specifically addressed the reasons stated for denial and has not provided any additional evidence pertaining to her eligibility for the classification sought. The appeal must therefore be summarily dismissed.
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed.