PetitionLens
All decisions
RemandedEB-2 · Appeal

Software telecom solutions business

Computing, AI & data · decided 2021-07-02 · NSC · JUL022021_01B5203

Official PDF on uscis.gov

How each part of the test was decided

Read from the appeals office's own sentences by fixed rules, not from the Director's findings or the petitioner's arguments. Each result shows the sentence it came from. The official PDF controls.

  • Step 0Eligible for EB-2Not decided
    The Director's denial rested on this
    The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the petition on the ground that the labor certification does not require at minimum a master's degree or a bachelor's degree and five years of experience, and that the job opportunity therefore does not qualify for advanced degree professional classification. p. 1
  • Prong 1Merit and national importanceNot decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

  • Prong 2Well positioned to advance itNot decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

  • Prong 3Worth waiving the job offerNot decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

The decision in brief

Sentences picked out of the text automatically. Read them in context below; the official PDF controls.

Summary sentence

Upon de nova review, we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand this matter for further consideration and the entry of a new decision. See in text

What the AAO decided

  • Since the Director did not request any evidence from the Petitioner to clarify its mm1mum requirements for the job offered, we will remand this case for further consideration. See in text
  • After the Petitioner's response to the evidence request, or the expiration ofthe time period for a response, the Director shall ORDER: The Director's decision is withdrawn. See in text
  • The matter is remanded for the entry of a new decision consistent with the foregoing analysis. issue a new decision on the petition. See in text
Read the full decision (4 pages)

Objections found (0)

Automated tags. Each shows the sentence that triggered it.

No catalog objection was detected in the analysis section.

    Full decision

    OCR text from the official PDF, reformatted for reading. Scan errors carry over; the PDF controls.

    Highlighted: Outcome (4)Matter of X citation
    Decision header
    U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services · In Re: 17513966 · Appeal of Nebraska Service Center Decision · Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office · DATE: WLY 2, 2021 · Form 1-140, Immigrant Petition for an Advanced Degree Professional

    The Petitioner, a software telecom solutions business, seeks to employ the Beneficiary as a solution architect. It requests classification of the Beneficiary as an advanced degree professional under the second preference immigrant category. Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 203(b)(2), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2). This employment-based "EB-2" immigrant classification allows a U.S. employer to sponsor a professional with an advanced degree for lawful permanent resident status.

    The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the petition on the ground that the labor certification does not require at minimum a master's degree or a bachelor's degree and five years of experience, and that the job opportunity therefore does not qualify for advanced degree professional classification.

    On appeal the Petitioner submits a brief and additional documentation, asserts that the labor certification's minimum requirements comport with the advanced degree professional classification sought in this proceeding, and requests that the Director's decision be overturned.

    Upon de nova review, we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand this matter for further consideration and the entry of a new decision.

    Law

    Employment-based immigration generally follows a three-step process. First, an employer obtains an approved labor certification (ETA Form 9089) from the U.S. Department ofLabor (DOL). See section 212(a)(5) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(5). By approving the labor certification, the DOL certifies that there are insufficient U.S. workers who are able, willing, qualified, and available for the offered position and that employing a foreign national in the position will not adversely affect the wages and working conditions ofdomestic workers similarly employed. See section 212(a)(5)(A)(i)(I)-(11) ofthe Act. Second, the employer files an immigrant visa petition (Form 1-140) with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). See section 204 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1154. Third, if USCIS approves the petition, the foreign national may apply for an immigrant visa abroad or, if eligible, adjustment of status in the United States. See section 245 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1255.

    The term "advanced degree" is defined in the regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2) as follows: Advanced degree means any United States academic or professional degree or a foreign equivalent degree above that of baccalaureate. A United States baccalaureate degree or a foreign equivalent degree followed by at least five years of progressive experience in the specialty shall be considered the equivalent of a master's degree.

    The regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(i) states that a petition for an advanced degree professional must be accompanied by either:

    (A)

    (B)

    An official academic record showing that the alien has a United States advanced degree or a foreign equivalent degree; or An official academic record showing that the alien has a United States baccalaureate degree or a foreign equivalent degree, and evidence in the form of letters from current or former employer(s) showing that the alien has at least five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in the specialty.

    In addition, a beneficiary must meet all of the education, training, experience, and other requirements specified on the labor certification as ofthe petition's priority date. 16 I&N Dec. 158, 159 (Acting Reg'l Comm'r 1977).

    Analysis

    See Matter ofWing's Tea House,

    The instant petition was accompanied by a labor certification that indicates the following in section H (Job Opportunity Information) regarding the requirements for the position of solution architect:

    4. Education: Minimum level required: 4-A. Major field o f study 5. Is training required for the job?

    6. Is experience in the job offered required?

    6-A. How long?

    7. Is an alternate field of study acceptable?

    Bachelor's degree

    Computer Science, Engineering, IT (Information Technology), or IS (Information Systems) No

    Yes

    60 months

    No

    Yes

    Master's degree

    2 years

    Yes

    Yes

    24 months

    Analyst, Engineer, or Software Development

    8. Is an alternate combination and experience acceptable?

    o f education

    8-A. What level of education? 8-C. How much experience?

    9. Is a foreign educational equivalent acceptable?

    10. Is experience in an alternate occupation acceptable?

    10-A. How long?

    10-B. What job title(s)?

    The priority date o f an employment-based immigrant petition is the date the underlying labor certification was filed with the DOL. 8 C.F.R. § 204.S(d). In this case the priority date is May 23, 2020.

    14.

    Specific skills or other requirements:

    Education and experience required: Bachelor's degree in Computer Science or Engineering or IT or IS plus 5 years progressive experience in the job offered or as Analyst or Engineer or Software Development. In lieu of Bachelor's degree and 5 years experience will accept Master's degree in Computer Science or Engineering or TT or TS plus 2 years experience in job offered or as Analyst or Engineer or Software Development. Prior work experience must include 2 years experience in Java, WebLogic, SpringBoot, Python, MVC, ANT, Maven, Eclipse, Jenkins, PowerShell.

    The Director denied the petition after filing on the ground that the labor certification's minimum requirements for the job offered were less that those required for the requested classification of advanced degree professional. The Director acknowledged the entries in sections H.4, H.6, H.8, and H.14 of the labor certification indicating that the job offered required either a bachelor's degree and five years of qualifying experience or a master's degree and two years of qualifying experience, including two years of experience with the software development tools identified in section H.14. However, the Director focused on the entries in sections H.4 and H.10 of the labor certification, interpreting them in combination as allowing an applicant with a bachelor's degree and two years of experience in one of three alternate occupations to qualify for the job offered. Since the combination of a bachelor's degree and two years of experience would not meet the minimum requirements for advanced degree professional classification, the Director concluded that the job opportunity did not qualify for the requested classification.

    On appeal the Petitioner asserts that its minimum requirements for the job of solution architect, as expressed in sections H.4, H.6, and H.8 of the labor certification, are either a bachelor's degree and five years of experience or a master's degree and two years of experience, (including two years of experience in the software development tools identified in section H.14). The entry in section H.10, the Petitioner contends, was not intended to establish an alternative combination of a bachelor's degree and two years of experience but instead should be read in conjunction with the foregoing requirements in sections H.4, H.6, and H.8. The Petitioner contends that any misconceptions raised by its entry in section H. IO are due to the poor drafting of the ETA Form 9089.

    As additional evidence of its actual minimum requirements the Petitioner submits copies of (1) the prevailing wage determination (Form ETA 9141) it filed with the DOL for the solution architect position and (2) the Petitioner's website posting for the solution architect position, both of which describe the educational and experience requirements in the same identical language used in section H.14 of the labor certification (essentially, a bachelor's degree and five years of qualifying experience or a master's degree and two years of qualifying experience). This documentation accords with the Petitioner's claim that its actual minimum requirements for the job offered are a bachelor's degree and five years of qualifying experience or a master's degree and two years of qualifying experience (including two years of experience with the software development tools identified in section H.14 of the labor certification). However, the Petitioner has not submitted its other recruitment materials underlying the labor certification, the actual online and print advertisements for the solution architect position. Without such evidence we cannot fully determine the veracity of the Petitioner's claim regarding the actual minimum requirements for the proffered position.

    Since the Director did not request any evidence from the Petitioner to clarify its mm1mum requirements for the job offered, we will remand this case for further consideration. The Director may request additional evidence, including online and print advertisements, of the Petitioner's minimum requirements for the position of solution architect. The Director may also address and request additional evidence on any further issues that may be deemed relevant, such as whether the Beneficiary has the necessary education and experience to meet the minimum requirements of the labor certification and to qualify for classification as an advanced degree professional. After the Petitioner's response to the evidence request, or the expiration ofthe time period for a response, the Director shall ORDER: The Director's decision is withdrawn. The matter is remanded for the entry of a new decision consistent with the foregoing analysis. issue a new decision on the petition.

    We note that shortly after the instant petition was denied the Petitioner filed another F01m 1-140 petition on behalfofthe Beneficiary (receipt number! ~' for the same job and based on the same labor certification, seeking professional (EB-3) classification under section 203(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act. That petition was approved on January 21, 2021.