PetitionLens
All decisions
SustainedEB-2 · Motion to reopen

Occupation not stated

Computing, AI & data · decided 2013-06-11 · TSC · JUN112013_05B5203

Official PDF on uscis.gov

Decided under the old NYSDOT test, replaced by Matter of Dhanasar on Dec 27, 2016. Useful for background only.

How each part of the test was decided

Read from the appeals office's own sentences by fixed rules, not from the Director's findings or the petitioner's arguments. Each result shows the sentence it came from. The official PDF controls.

  • Step 0Eligible for EB-2Not decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

The decision in brief

Sentences picked out of the text automatically. Read them in context below; the official PDF controls.

What the AAO decided

Main reasons given

  • Based on the evidence submitted, including the beneficiary's Bachelor of Commerce degree and his Master of Commerce degree, both from and the two credential evaluations, the petitioner has demonstrated that the beneficiary holds the equivalent of a single degree from an 1 The submission of additional evidence on appeal is allowed by the instructions to the Form I-290B, which are incorporated into the regulations by the regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(a)(1). See in text
Read the full decision (3 pages)

Objections found (0)

Automated tags. Each shows the sentence that triggered it.

No catalog objection was detected in the analysis section.

    Full decision

    OCR text from the official PDF, reformatted for reading. Scan errors carry over; the PDF controls.

    Highlighted: Outcome (4) AAO finding (1)Matter of X citation
    Decision header
    Date: JUN 1 1 2013 Office: TEXAS SERVICE CENTER · INRE: Petitioner: · Beneficiary : U.S . .Department ofHomeland Security U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) 20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., MS 2090 Washington, DC 20529-2090 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services FILE: · PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as a Member of the Professions Holding an Advanced

    Degree or an Alien of Exceptional Ability Pursuant to Section 203(b)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2)

    ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER:

    SELF REPRESENTED

    INSTRUCTIONS:

    Enclosed please find the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All of the documents related to this matter have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Please be advised that any further inquiry that you might have concerning your case must be made to that office. Thank you,

    Ron Rosenberg

    Acting Chief, Administrative Appeals Office www.uscis.gov

    DISCUSSION: The Director, Texas Service Center (the director), denied the employment-based immigrant visa petition. The petitioner filed a motion to reopen and reconsider, which was denied by the director. The petitioner appealed to the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO). The appeal will be sustained. The petition will be approved.

    The petitioner is a computer consulting services business. It seeks to employ the beneficiary permanently in the United States as a senior programmer analyst. An ETA Form 9089, Application for Permanent Employment Certification approved by the Department of Labor (DOL), accompanied the petition. Upon reviewing the petition, the director determined that the beneficiary did not satisfy the minimum level of education stated on the labor certification.

    The record shows that the appeal is properly filed, timely and makes a specific allegation of error in law or fact. The AAO conducts appellate review on a de novo basis. See Soltane v. DOJ, 381 F.3d 143, 145 (3d Cir. 2004). The AAO considers all pertinent evidence in the record, including new evidence properly submitted upon appeal.1

    In pertinent part, section 203(b)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) provides immigrant classification to members of the professions holding advanced degrees or their equivalent and whose services are sought by an employer in the United States. An advanced degree is a United States academic or professional degree or a foreign equivalent degree above the baccalaureate level. 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2). The regulation further states: "A United States baccalaureate degree or a foreign equivalent degree followed by at least five years of progressive experience in the specialty shall be considered the equivalent of a master 's degree. If a doctoral degree is customarily required by the specialty, the alien must have a United States doctorate or a foreign equivalent degree." !d. The job qualifications requirements are found on Part H of the ETA Form 9089. As to the certified job's title, duties and minimum level of education and experience required for the proffered position in this matter, Part H-4 of the ETA Form 9089 indicates that the minimum educational requirements for the certified position of senior programmer analyst is a bachelor's degree in "Computer/science/engineering." Part H-6 indicates that 60 months of experience in the proffered position is required. Part H-7 and H-8 indicate that the alternate field of study that would be acceptable is "Engineering/business" related and that a master's degree plus two years of experience would also be accepted. Part H-9 states that a foreign educational equivalent is acceptable. Part H-10 states that 60 months of experience as an IT developer/IT consultant/ technical consultant would also be accepted.

    Based on the evidence submitted, including the beneficiary's Bachelor of Commerce degree and his Master of Commerce degree, both from and the two credential evaluations, the petitioner has demonstrated that the beneficiary holds the equivalent of a single degree from an 1 The submission of additional evidence on appeal is allowed by the instructions to the Form I-290B, which are incorporated into the regulations by the regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(a)(1). The record in the instant case provides no reason to preclude consideration of any of the documents newly submitted on appeal. See Matter of Soriano, 19 I&N Dec. 764 (BIA 1988). p. 3 accredited college or university in the United States which satisfies the requirements of the Form ETA 9089 and the regulation under section 8 C.P.R. § 204.5(1)(3)(ii)(C). The AAO concludes that the beneficiary has a "United States baccalaureate degree or a foreign equivalent degree," and, thus, qualifies for preference visa classification under section 203(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act as a professional. The burden of proof in these proceedings rests solely with the petitioner. Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1361. The petitioner has met that burden.

    ORDER: The appeal is sustained. The petition is approved.