PetitionLens
All decisions
SustainedEB-2 · Motion to reopen

Occupation not stated

Other / unclear · decided 2013-06-27 · NSC · JUN272013_02B5203

Official PDF on uscis.gov

Decided under the old NYSDOT test, replaced by Matter of Dhanasar on Dec 27, 2016. Useful for background only.

How each part of the test was decided

Read from the appeals office's own sentences by fixed rules, not from the Director's findings or the petitioner's arguments. Each result shows the sentence it came from. The official PDF controls.

  • Step 0Eligible for EB-2Not decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

The decision in brief

Sentences picked out of the text automatically. Read them in context below; the official PDF controls.

What the AAO decided

  • The petition will be approved. See in text
  • Accordingly, the petition is approved under section 203(b)(2) ofthe Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2) in the advanced degree professional classification. See in text
  • ORDER: The appeal is sustained, and the petition is approved. See in text

Main reasons given

  • Upon review and reconsideration of the entire record, the AAO concludes that the petitioner has established that it has had the ability to pay the proffered wage. See in text
Read the full decision (2 pages)

Objections found (0)

Automated tags. Each shows the sentence that triggered it.

No catalog objection was detected in the analysis section.

    Full decision

    OCR text from the official PDF, reformatted for reading. Scan errors carry over; the PDF controls.

    Highlighted: Outcome (4) AAO finding (1)Matter of X citation
    Decision header
    U.S. Department ofHomeland Security U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) 20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., MS 2090 Washington, DC 20529-2090 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services · DATE: JUN 2 7 2013 OFFICE: NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER FILE: · INRE: Petitioner: · Beneficiary: · PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as a Member of the Professions Holding an Advanced

    Degree or an Alien of Exceptional Ability Pursuant to Section 203(b )(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2)

    ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER:

    INSTRUCTIONS:

    Enclosed please find the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All of the documents related to this matter have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Please be advised that any further inquiry that you might have concerning your case must be made to that office. Thank you,

    I

    ~l}-L.fr

    Ron Rosenberg

    Acting Chief, Administrative Appeals Office www.uscis.gov

    DISCUSSION: The preference visa petition was denied by the Director, Nebraska Service Center. The director denied the petitioner's motion to reopen and reconsider. The matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeaL The appeal will be sustained. The petition will be approved.

    The petitioner is a real estate investment and development firm. It seeks to employ the beneficiary permanently in the United States as a graphic designer with classification as an advanced degree professional pursuant to Section 203(b)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2). As required by statute, the petition is accompanied by an ETA Form 9089, Application for Permanent Employment Certification, approved by the United States Department of Labor (DOL). The director determined that the petitioner failed to demonstrate that it had the continuing ability to pay the proffered wage. The director denied the petition, accordingly. The AAO conducts appellate review on a de novo basis. See Soltane v. DOJ, 381 F.3d 143, 145 (3d Cir. 2004).

    In pertinent part, section 203(b)(2) of the Act provides immigrant classification to members of the professions holding advanced degrees or their equivalent and whose services are sought by an employer in the United States. An advanced degree is a United States academic or professional degree or a foreign equivalent degree above the baccalaureate level. 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2). The regulation further states: "A United States baccalaureate degree or a foreign equivalent degree followed by at least five years of progressive experience in the specialty shall be considered the equivalent of a master's degree. If a doctoral degree is customarily required by the specialty, the alien must have a United States doctorate or a foreign equivalent degree." !d.

    The petitioner must demonstrate that, on the priority date, the beneficiary had the qualifications stated on its ETA Form 9089, Application for Permanent Employment Certification, as certified by the DOL and submitted with the instant petition. Matter of Wing's Tea House, 16 I&N Dec. 158 (Acting Reg'l Comm'r 1977). The petitioner must also establish that it has had the continuing ability to pay the proffered wage from the priority date onward. The priority date is the date the ETA Form 9089, Application for Permanent Employment Certification, ~as accepted for processing by any office within the employment system ofthe DOL. See 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(d).

    Here, the priority date as established by the ETA Form 9089 is December 30, 2005. Upon review and reconsideration of the entire record, the AAO concludes that the petitioner has established that it has had the ability to pay the proffered wage. Accordingly, the petition is approved under section 203(b)(2) ofthe Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2) in the advanced degree professional classification. The burden of proof in these proceedings rests solely with the petitioner. Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1361. The petitioner has met that burden.

    ORDER: The appeal is sustained, and the petition is approved.