PetitionLens
All decisions
SustainedNational Interest Waiver · Appeal

Biocompatibility material scientist

Engineering · decided 2023-03-15 · TSC · MAR152023_06B5203

Official PDF on uscis.gov

How each part of the test was decided

Read from the appeals office's own sentences by fixed rules, not from the Director's findings or the petitioner's arguments. Each result shows the sentence it came from. The official PDF controls.

  • Step 0Eligible for EB-2Not decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

  • Prong 1Merit and national importanceNot decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

  • Prong 2Well positioned to advance itMet
    Why
    Accordingly, the Petitioner has demonstrated that he satisfies the second prong of the Dhanasar framework. p. 3
  • Prong 3Worth waiving the job offerMet
    Why
    The Petitioner, therefore, meets the third prong ofthe Dhanasar framework. p. 4

The decision in brief

Sentences picked out of the text automatically. Read them in context below; the official PDF controls.

Summary sentence

For the reasons discussed below, we conclude the Petitioner has established eligibility for a national interest waiver under the analytical framework set forth in Dhanasar. See in text

What the AAO decided

Main reasons given

  • Accordingly, the Petitioner has demonstrated that he satisfies the second prong of the Dhanasar framework. See in text
  • The Petitioner, therefore, meets the third prong ofthe Dhanasar framework. See in text
  • For the reasons discussed below, we conclude the Petitioner has established eligibility for a national interest waiver under the analytical framework set forth in Dhanasar. See in text
Show 3 more
  • In addition, because the Petitioner has documented his past successes in advancing research relating to materials evolution and chemical characteristics and the significance of his proposed work to advance the quality of patient lives through improved wound care materials, we conclude that he offers contributions of such value that, on balance, they would benefit the United States even assuming that other qualified U.S. workers are available. See in text
  • We conclude that he has established he is eligible for and otherwise merits a national interest waiver as a matter of discretion. See in text
  • After reviewing the Petitioner's submissions, such as letters of support from fellow experts in the biosystems engineering field and the support letter from the Petitioner's current employer highlighting the broader benefit and implications of the Petitioner's proposed research, we agree with the Director's determination that Petitioner has demonstrated both the substantial merit and national importance o f his proposed research. See in text
Read the full decision (4 pages)

Objections found (0)

Automated tags. Each shows the sentence that triggered it.

No catalog objection was detected in the analysis section.

    Full decision

    OCR text from the official PDF, reformatted for reading. Scan errors carry over; the PDF controls.

    Highlighted: Outcome (2) AAO finding (6)Matter of X citation
    Decision header
    U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services · In Re: 24834854 · Appeal of Texas Service Center Decision · Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office · Date: MAR. 15, 2023 · Form 1-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker (National Interest Waiver)

    The Petitioner, a biocompatibility material scientist, seeks employment-based second preference (EB- 2) immigrant classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, as well as a national interest waiver of the job offer requirement attached to this classification. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 203(b)(2), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2).

    The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the petition, concluding that although the Petitioner qualified for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree he had not established that a waiver of the required job offer, and thus of the labor certification, would be in the national interest. The matter is now before us on appeal.

    The Petitioner bears the burden ofproofto demonstrate eligibility by a preponderance ofthe evidence. Matter ofChawathe, 25 I&N Dec. 369, 375-76 (AAO 2010). We review the questions in this matter de novo. Matter ofChristo's, Inc., 26 l&N Dec. 537, 537 n.2 (AAO 2015). Upon de novo review, we will sustain the appeal.

    Law

    An advanced degree is any United States academic or professional degree or a foreign equivalent degree above that of a bachelor's degree. A United States bachelor's degree or foreign equivalent degree followed by five years ofprogressive experience in the specialty is the equivalent ofa master's degree. I f a doctoral degree is customarily required for the specialty, the non-citizen must a United States doctorate or a foreign equivalent degree. 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2).

    I f a petitioner demonstrates eligibility for the underlying EB-2 classification, they must then establish that they merit a discretionary waiver of the job offer requirement "in the national interest." Section 203(b)(2)(B)(i) of the Act. While neither the statute nor the pertinent regulations define the term "national interest," Matter of Dhanasar, 26 I&N Dec. 884, 889 (AAO 2016), provides the framework for adjudicating national interest waiver petitions. Dhanasar states that U.S. Citizenship p. 2 and Immigration Services (USCIS) may, as matter of discretion , grant a national interest waiver if the petitioner demonstrates that:

    • The proposed endeavor has both substantial merit and national importance;
    • The individual is well-positioned to advance their proposed endeavor; and
    • On balance, waiving the job offer requirement would benefit the United States.

    Analysis

    The Director found that the Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. requirement of a job offer, and thus a labor certification, would be in the national interest.

    At the time of filing, the Petitioner was serving in a research position as biocompatibility material scientist in the medical solutions division atl 2 The Petitioner described his prior research in the energy sector where he worked to "convert [] waste into important biofuels for energy production"; he explained that in his prior work in the energy sector, he used materials evaluation and chemical characterization, the same strategies that he now applies in his proposed endeavor within the healthcare sector for "the development and improvement of new and existing materials for advanced and surgical wound care." The Petitioner provided a letter from his supervisor,! ISenior Research Manager o f O m e d i c a l solutions division, who stated that the Petitioner's work involves three primary responsibilities: "1) understanding the impact of manufacturing and/or design changes on material properties and product characteristics, 2) creating novel materials and developing existing materials in order to improve the performance and quality of advanced wound dressing products, and 3) participating in the innovation and creation of new and novel user solutions." I I highlighted the national significance of the Petitioner's research, pointing out that his work is aimed at improving patient outcomes by developing novel materials for advanced and surgical wound care.

    The Petitioner further stated that the proposed endeavor involves his continued work as a researcher a t 0 w h e r e he will not only fulfill the above-stated responsibilities, but also publish and present his research findings in peer-reviewed venues. The Petitioner elaborated on his current project, stating that it involves "research on the development of a new porcine hard-to-heal wound model" and corresponding clinical studies whose goal is to provide cost-effective care while improve existing treatment methods and patients' quality of life.

    For the reasons discussed below, we conclude the Petitioner has established eligibility for a national interest waiver under the analytical framework set forth in Dhanasar.

    See also Poursina v. USCIS, 936 F.3d 868 (9th Cir. 2019) (finding USCTS' decision to grant or deny a national interest waiver to be discretionary in nature).

    A. Substantial Merit and National Importance

    The first prong, substantial merit and national importance, focuses on the specific endeavor that the individualproposestoundertake. Theendeavor'smeritmaybedemonstratedinarangeofareassuch as business, entrepreneurialism, science, technology, culture, health, or education. In determining whether the proposed endeavor has national importance, we consider its potential prospective impact. Dhanasar, 26 I&N Dec. at 889.

    The Director determined that the Petitioner provided sufficient evidence to meet this prong of the Dhanasar framework. After reviewing the Petitioner's submissions, such as letters of support from fellow experts in the biosystems engineering field and the support letter from the Petitioner's current employer highlighting the broader benefit and implications of the Petitioner's proposed research, we agree with the Director's determination that Petitioner has demonstrated both the substantial merit and national importance o f his proposed research.

    B. Well Positioned to Advance the Proposed Endeavor

    The second prong shifts the focus from the proposed endeavor to the Petitioner. The record includes the Petitioner's curriculum vitae, his academic records (including his Ph.D. and Master of Science degree), published and presented work, peer review activity, and documentation of numerous articles that cited to his research findings. expertise in biosystems engineering, materials evolution, and chemical characterization research and his past record of success in that field. Several expert references identify specific examples of how the Petitioner's research has affected his field. As corroborating documentation regarding the significance of his work, the Petitioner provided evidence showing that his published work has been frequently cited by independent researchers, and that the rate at which his work has been cited is high relative to others in the field. His experience and expertise as a biosystems engineering researcher, published articles, citation evidence, progress in his field, and his current employment with position him well to advance his proposed endeavor. Accordingly, the Petitioner has demonstrated that he satisfies the second prong of the Dhanasar framework.

    C. Whether on Balance a Waiver is Beneficial

    The third prong requires the Petitioner to demonstrate that, on balance, it would be beneficial to the In addition, the Petitioner offered reference letters describing his United States to waive the requirements of a job offer and thus of a labor certification. biosystems engineering researcher with both a Ph.D. and Master of Science degree, the Petitioner endeavor and related to work fu11hering a critical and emerging technology or other STEM area important to U.S. competitiveness or national security, an especially positive factor to be considered along with other evidence for purposes ofthe assessment under the second prong." See 6 USCIS Policy Manual F.5(D)(2), https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual. When evaluating the third prong. USCTS considers the following combination of facts contained in the record to be a strong positive factor:

    • The person possesses an advanced STEM degree, particularly a Ph.D.
    • The person will be engaged in work furthering a critical and emerging technology or other STEM area important to U.S. competitiveness; and
    • The person is well positioned to advance the proposed STEM endeavor ofnational importance.

    As a

    "USCIS considers an advanced degree, particularly a Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.), in a STEM field tied to the proposed See USC1S Policy Manual, supra. at F.5(D)(2). p. 4 possesses considerable experience and expertise in developing and improving material properties and product characteristics. The record also demonstrates the potential for widespread medical benefits associated with the Petitioner's current research in developing and improving wound care dressing materials. In addition, because the Petitioner has documented his past successes in advancing research relating to materials evolution and chemical characteristics and the significance of his proposed work to advance the quality of patient lives through improved wound care materials, we conclude that he offers contributions of such value that, on balance, they would benefit the United States even assuming that other qualified U.S. workers are available. The Petitioner, therefore, meets the third prong ofthe Dhanasar framework.

    Conclusion

    The Petitioner has met the requisite three prongs set forth in the Dhanasar analytical framework. We conclude that he has established he is eligible for and otherwise merits a national interest waiver as a matter of discretion.

    ORDER: The appeal is sustained.