The Petitioner, a general and operations manager, seeks employment-based second preference (EB-2) immigrant classification as either a member of the professions holding an advanced degree or an individual of exceptional ability, as well as a national interest waiver of the job offer requirement attached to this classification. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 203(b )(2), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b )(2).
The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the petition, concluding the Petitioner did not establish that a waiver of the required job offer, and thus of the labor certification, would be in the national interest. The Petitioner filed an appeal, which we rejected. We then dismissed a subsequent motion to reopen. The matter is before us again on a second combined motion to reopen and reconsider.
The USCIS office that made the last decision in a matter generally has jurisdiction over later motions. 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(l)(i)-(ii). The Administrative Appeals Office (AAO), however, did not decide the Petitioner's appeal but rather rejected it. Thus, we lack jurisdiction over the Petitioner's motions. See generally AAO Practice Manual, Ch. 4.5(a), https://www.uscis.gov/aao-practice-manual (stating that "[t]he AAO will deny a motion to reopen or reconsider its rejection of an appeal").
We must dismiss motions that do not meet applicable requirements. 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(4). We will, therefore, dismiss the Petitioner's motions.
ORDER: The motion to reopen is dismissed.
FURTHER ORDER: The motion to reconsider is dismissed.