PetitionLens
All decisions
SustainedEB-2 · Appeal

Occupation not stated

Education · decided 2014-09-19 · TSC · SEP192014_02B5203

Official PDF on uscis.gov

Decided under the old NYSDOT test, replaced by Matter of Dhanasar on Dec 27, 2016. Useful for background only.

How each part of the test was decided

Read from the appeals office's own sentences by fixed rules, not from the Director's findings or the petitioner's arguments. Each result shows the sentence it came from. The official PDF controls.

  • Step 0Eligible for EB-2Not decided
    The Director's denial rested on this
    The Director denied the petition on February 3, 2014, finding that the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary had the requisite educational degree for classification as an advanced degree professional. p. 2

The decision in brief

Sentences picked out of the text automatically. Read them in context below; the official PDF controls.

What the AAO decided

  • The director's decision will be withdrawn and the appeal will be sustained. See in text
Read the full decision (3 pages)

Objections found (0)

Automated tags. Each shows the sentence that triggered it.

No catalog objection was detected in the analysis section.

    Full decision

    OCR text from the official PDF, reformatted for reading. Scan errors carry over; the PDF controls.

    Highlighted: Outcome (1)Matter of X citation
    Decision header
    DATE: SEP 1 9 2014 OFFICE: TEXAS SERVICE CENTER · INRE : Petitioner: · Beneficiary: U.S. Department of Homeland Security U.S. Citizen ship and Immigratio n Services Administr ative Appeals Office (AAO) 20 Mass achusetts Ave., N.W. , MS 2090 Washington , DC 20529-2090 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services FILE: · PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as a Member of the Professions Holding an Advanced

    Degree or an Alien of Exceptional Ability Pursuant to Section 203(b)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S .C. § 1153(b)(2)

    ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER:

    INSTRUCTIONS:

    Enclosed please find the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case . All of the documents related to this matter have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Please be advised that any further inquiry that you might have concerning your case must be made to that office .

    Thank you,

    L,/(f, ,,

    Ron Rosenberg

    Chief, Administrative Appeal s Office www.uscis.gov

    DISCUSSION: The employment-based immigrant visa petition was denied by the Director, Texas Service Center (Director). It is now on appeal before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO). The director's decision will be withdrawn and the appeal will be sustained.

    The petitioner describes itself as an application development and integration company . It seeks to permanently employ the beneficiary in the United States as a Software Engineer pursuant to section 203(b)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2). 1 As required by statute, the petition is accompanied by an Application for Permanent Employment Certification, ETA Form 9089, certified by the United States Department of Labor (DOL) .

    The Director denied the petition on February 3, 2014, finding that the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary had the requisite educational degree for classification as an advanced degree professional.

    The petitioner filed a timely appeal, along with a brief from counsel and supporting documentation . We conduct appellate review on a de novo basis. See Soltane v. DOJ, 381 F.3d 143, 145 (3d Cir. 2004)~

    Section 203(b )(2) of the Act provides for the granting of preference classification to members of the professions holding advanced degrees whose services are sought by employers in the United States. The regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(i) states that a petition for an advanced degree professional must be accompanied by:

    (A) An official academic record showing that the alien has a United States advanced degree or a foreign equivalent degree; or

    (B) An official academic record showing that the alien has a United States baccalaureate degree or a foreign equivalent degree, and evidence in the form of letters from current or former employer(s) showing that the alien has at least five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in the specialty.

    To be eligible for approval, a beneficiary must have all the education, training, and experience specified on the labor certification as of the petition's priority date. See Matter of Wing's Tea House, 16 I&N 158 (Act. Reg. Comm. 1977). The petitioner must also establish its continuing ability to pay the proffered wage to the beneficiary from the priority date up to the present. See 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2). The priority date of the instant petition is July 18, 2012, which is the date the underlying labor certification was accepted