PetitionLens

729 decisions

newest first
  1. DismissedEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-03-08· old NYSDOT test
    Occupation not statedMAR082013_06B5203
    Education

    The Director concluded, therefore, that the beneficiary's degree does not qualify her for classification as an advanced degree professional.

  2. DismissedNIW · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-02-20· old NYSDOT test
    Occupation not statedFEB202013_03B5203
    Education

    The director found that the petitioner qualifies for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, but that the petitioner has not established that an exemption,from the requi,rement of a job offer would be in the national interest of the United· States.

    Claims not backed by documentsFive years of progressive experience not documentedNo interest from users, customers or investors
  3. DismissedNIW · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-02-19· old NYSDOT test
    Occupation not statedFEB192013_07B5203
    Law & policy

    The director also found that the petitioner has not established that an exemption from the requirement of a job offer would be in the national interest ofthe United States.

    Citation record not persuasiveClaims not backed by documentsArgued the field's importance, not the endeavor'sInconsistencies in the recordSupport letters generic or unsupported+2 more
  4. MotionNIW · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-02-01· old NYSDOT test
    Domestic violence advocateFEB012013_07B5203
    Other / unclear

    The director found that the petitioner qualifies for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, but that the petitioner has not established that an exemption from the requirement of a job offer would be in the national interest of the United States.

    No interest from users, customers or investors
  5. DismissedNIW · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-01-29· old NYSDOT test
    Occupation not statedJAN292013_08B5203
    Law & policy

    The director found that the petitioner qualifies for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, but that the petitioner has not established that an exemption from the requirement of a job o~fer would be in the national interest ofthe United States.

    Citation record not persuasiveArgued the field's importance, not the endeavor'sSupport letters generic or unsupportedNo interest from users, customers or investorsPast record does not show influence or success
  6. DismissedEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-01-29· old NYSDOT test
    Occupation not statedJAN292013_14B5203
    Engineering

    Beyond the decision of the director, the petitioner has also failed to establish that the ETA Form 9089 supports a professional holding an advanced degree.

    Claims not backed by documents
  7. DismissedNIW · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-01-24· old NYSDOT test
    Occupation not statedJAN242013_01B5203
    Business & finance

    The director found that the peti~oner has not establiShed that he qualifies for classification as an alien of exceptional ability in busine1:;s or as a member of the professions holding· an advanced degree, or that an exemption from the requirement of a job offer would be in the national interest of the United States .

    Claims not backed by documentsJob creation or economic claims unsupportedArgued the field's importance, not the endeavor'sInconsistencies in the recordSupport letters generic or unsupported+1 more
  8. DismissedEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-01-15· old NYSDOT test
    Occupation not statedJAN152013_02B5203
    Education

    Upon reviewing the petition, the director determined that the beneficiary did not satisfy the minimum level of education stated on the labor certification or as required by the advanced.

  9. DismissedNIW · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-01-10· old NYSDOT test
    Chief executiveJAN102013_01B5203
    Business & finance

    The director found that the beneficiary qualifies for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, btit that the petitioner has not established that an exemption from the requirement of ajob offer would be in the national interest of the United Stat~s.

    Job creation or economic claims unsupportedNot eligible at the time of filingArgued the field's importance, not the endeavor'sNo interest from users, customers or investors