2,079 decisions
newest first- SustainedEB-2 · Appeal2013-02-26· old NYSDOT testAlien of exceptional ability as a professional hockey playerFEB262013_01B5203Other / unclear
- RejectedEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-02-25· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB252013_02B5203Other / unclear
The director determined that the late appeal did not meet the requirements of a motion and forwarded the matter to the AAO.
- MotionEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-02-21· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB212013_02B5203Other / unclear
· The director determined that the ETA Form 9089 failed to demonstrate that the job requires a professional holding an advanced degree or the equivalent of an alien of exceptional ability and, therefore, the beneficiary cannot be found qualified for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree or an alien of exceptional ability.
Inconsistencies in the record - DismissedEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-02-21· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB212013_03B5203Computing, AI & data
The director determined that the evidence did not establish that the beneficiary possessed either a bachelor's or master's degree in the •major field listed on the ·ETA Form.
- DismissedEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-02-21· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB212013_06B5203Computing, AI & data
The director determined that the ETA ·Form 9089 failed to demonstrate that the job requires a professional holding an advanced degree and, therefore, the beneficiary cannot be found qualified for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree.
- RejectedEB-2 · Motion to reopen2013-02-21· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB212013_07B5203Other / unclear
The director determined that the petitioner failed to establish that it had continuing ability to pay the proffered wage to the beneficiary since the.
- DismissedNIW · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-02-20· old NYSDOT testEngineer scientistFEB202013_04B5203Engineering
The director found that the petitioner qualifies for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, but that the petitioner has not established that an exemption from the requirement of a job offer would be in the national interest of the United States.
Citation record not persuasiveClaims not backed by documentsNo interest from users, customers or investors - DismissedEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-02-19· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB192013_01B5203Other / unclear
- DismissedEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-02-19· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB192013_04B5203Engineering
Upon reviewing the petition, the director determined that the beneficiary did not qualify for the second preference classification and that the beneficiary did meet the job qualifications stated on the alien employment certification before the priority date.
Not eligible at the time of filingFive years of progressive experience not documentedInconsistencies in the recordSupport letters generic or unsupported - DismissedNIW · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-02-15· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB152013_01B5203Computing, AI & data
The director found that the petitioner qualifies for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, but that the petitioner has not established that an exemption from the requirement of a job offer would be in the national interest ofthe United States.
Claims not backed by documentsArgued the field's importance, not the endeavor'sNo interest from users, customers or investors - DismissedEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-02-15· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB152013_02B5203Other / unclear
The director found that the petitioner qualifies for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, but that the petitioner has not established that an exemption from the requirement of a job offer would be in the national interest ofthe United States.
No interest from users, customers or investors - RejectedEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-02-12· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB122013_01B5203Other / unclear
In his February 17, 2009 decision, the director determined that the petitioner had failed to establish · its ability to pay the beneficiary the proffered salary from the priority date onwards.
- RejectedEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-02-12· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB122013_02B5203Other / unclear
In his December 3, 2008 decision, the director determined that the petitioner had failed to establish its ability to pay the beneficiary the proffered salary froin the priority date onwards.
- MotionEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-02-12· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB122013_03B5203Other / unclear
The director determined that the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the beneficiary has a mas_ter's degree or foreign equivalent degree as required by the labor certification.
- MotionEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-02-12· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB122013_04B5203Computing, AI & data
Upon reviewing the petition, the director detennined that the beneficiary did not satisfy the minimum level of education stated on the alien employment certification.
Claims not backed by documentsDegree not shown to be a U.S. advanced degree equivalentFive years of progressive experience not documented - WithdrawnEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-02-12· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB122013_05B5203Computing, AI & data
Therefore, it does not qualify as an advanced degree within the meaning of 8 C.
- RejectedEB-2 · Motion to reconsider2013-02-06· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB062013_01B5203Other / unclear
The dire~;:tor determined that the late appeal did not meet the requirements .
- SustainedEB-2 · Appeal2013-02-06· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB062013_02B5203Other / unclear
- SustainedEB-2 · Appeal2013-02-06· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB062013_03B5203Other / unclear
- DismissedEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-02-05· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB052013_02B5203Other / unclear
The director determined that the petitioner had not established it had ·the continuing ability to pay the beneficiary the proffered wage beginning on the priority date of the visa petition and that the beneficiary met the qualification requirements of the.