11 decisions
newest first- RemandedNIW · Appeal2026-05-05Manufacturing optimization consultantMAY052026_01B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw SCOPS' decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Degree not shown to be a U.S. advanced degree equivalentFive years of progressive experience not documented - RemandedEB-2 · Appeal2025-12-18EngineerDEC182025_01B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Degree not shown to be a U.S. advanced degree equivalent - RemandedNIW · Appeal2024-05-21Customs and trade specialistMAY212024_02B5203Engineering
Upon de nova review, we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Degree not shown to be a U.S. advanced degree equivalentProposed endeavor too vagueFive years of progressive experience not documentedDid not show the waiver outweighs labor certificationPast record does not show influence or success - RemandedNIW · Appeal2024-04-23Computer and information systems managerAPR232024_01B5203Computing, AI & data
Upon de nova review, we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Degree not shown to be a U.S. advanced degree equivalentFive years of progressive experience not documentedDid not show the waiver outweighs labor certification - RemandedNIW · Appeal2023-02-22Marketing and data analytics consultantFEB222023_01B5203Computing, AI & data
2 (AAO 2015), we conclude that a remand is warranted in this case because the Director's decision is insufficient for review.
Degree not shown to be a U.S. advanced degree equivalent - RemandedNIW · Appeal2021-08-24Software developerAUG242021_01B5203Computing, AI & data
Upon de nova review, we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand the matter for further review of the record and issuance of a new decision.
Degree not shown to be a U.S. advanced degree equivalentExceptional ability not establishedFive years of progressive experience not documented - RemandedNIW · Appeal2021-07-14Architectural engineerJUL142021_02B5203Engineering
" While we conduct de nova review on appeal, we conclude that a remand is warranted in this case because the Director's decision is insufficient for review.
Degree not shown to be a U.S. advanced degree equivalent - RemandedEB-2 · Appeal2017-06-20Computer consulting businessJUN202017_01B5203Computing, AI & data
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision of the Director and remand the matter for further proceedings consistent with the foregoing opinion and for the entry of a new decision.
Degree not shown to be a U.S. advanced degree equivalentFive years of progressive experience not documentedInconsistencies in the record - RemandedEB-2 · Appeal2017-04-27Provider of information technology servicesAPR272017_01B5203Computing, AI & data
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand the matter for further proceedings consistent with the following opinion and for the entry of a new decision.
Degree not shown to be a U.S. advanced degree equivalentSupport letters generic or unsupported - RemandedEB-2 · Appeal2016-12-02· old NYSDOT testProvider of information technology consulting and software development servicesDEC022016_01B5203Computing, AI & data
Upon de novo review, we will therefore remand the matter to the Director.
Degree not shown to be a U.S. advanced degree equivalentNot eligible at the time of filing - RemandedEB-2 · Appeal2013-06-20· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedJUN202013_04B5203Engineering
The matter will be remanded to the director for further action, consideration, and the entry of a new decision in accordance with the decision below.
Degree not shown to be a U.S. advanced degree equivalentInconsistencies in the record