1,470 decisions

The director found that the petitioner qualifies for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, but that the petitioner has not established that an exemption from the requirement of a job offer would be in the national interest of the United States.

The director's decision denying the petition concluded that the petitioner had not established that it had the continuing ability to pay the proffered wages of the beneficiary and its other sponsored workers or that the beneficiary possessed the foreign equivalent of a U.

In a decision dated December 20, 2014, the Director denied the petition on the ground that the minimum educational and experience requirements on the labor certification did not demonstrate that a master's degree or a baccalaureate degree and five years of progressively responsible experience is required to qualify for the job.

The director found that the petitioner qualifies for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, but that the petitioner has not established that an exemption from the requirement of a job offer would be in the national interest of the United States.

The director found that the petitioner qualifies for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, but that the petitioner has not established that an exemption from the requirement of a job offer would be in the national interest of the United States.

The director found that the petitioner had not established that he qualifies for the classification sought.

master's degree, he does not qualify for the proffered position under the terms of the labor certification based solely on his education.

Upon review of the entire record, including evidence submitted on appeal and in response to a Request for Evidence issued by us, we conclude that the petitioner has established that it is more likely than not that the beneficiary had all the education, training, and experience specified on the ETA Form 9089 as of the priority date of May 14, 2013.

The Director found that the petitioner did not establish the beneficiary's five years of progressive post-bachelor work experience in the job offered or in an alternate occupation.

Our decision dismissing the appeal found that the evidence of record does not establish the beneficiary's possession of a U.

The appeal will be remanded to the director in accordance with the following.

The petitioner also has not established that it had sufficient net income to pay the proffered wages of its other sponsored workers in any of the years at issue.

Applying the analysis set forth above to the instant petition, the petitioner has not established a valid successor relationship for immigration purposes.

The director found that the beneficiary did not meet the requirements for classification as an advanced degree professional.

The director found that the petitioner has not established that he qualifies for classification as an alien of exceptional ability, and therefore declined to make a determination as to whether an exemption from the requirement of a job offer would be in the national interest of the United States.

The Director concluded that the record did not establish the beneficiary's qualifying experience for the offered position by the petition's priority date.

The director's decision denying the petition states that the evidence submitted did not demonstrate that the beneficiary had 26 months of experience.

The director found that the petitioner qualifies for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, but that the petitioner has not established that an exemption from the requirement of a job offer would be in the national interest of the United States.