437 decisions

Upon de novo review, we will withdraw our decision to sustain the appeal and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.

Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) denied the petition, concluding that the Petitioner did not establish that he met the initial evidentiary requirements for EB-2 classification as an individual of exceptional ability, and that a waiver of the required job offer, and thus of a labor certification, would be in the national interest.

Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) denied the petition, concluding the Petitioner did not establish that a waiver of the required job offer, and thus of the labor certification, would be in the national interest.

If the record does not establish that the Form I-290B and the Form G-28 were personally signed by the Petitioner, we cannot recognize the motion forms to have been properly filed by an affected party with legal standing in these proceedings.

We will therefore withdraw SCOPS' decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.

Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.

Service Center Operations (SCOPS) denied the petition, concluding the Petitioner did not establish eligibility for the underlying immigrant classification, or that a waiver of the required job offer, and thus of the labor certification, would be in the national interest.

Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.

Service Center Operations (SCOPS) denied the petition, concluding that the Petitioner qualified for the classification as a member ofthe professions holding an advanced degree but did not establish that a waiver ofthe required job offer, and thus of the labor certification, would be in the national interest.

We will therefore withdraw SCOPS' decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.

Service Center Operations (SCOPS) denied the petition, concluding that the record did not establish that the Petitioner is eligible for or otherwise merits a national interest waiver as a matter of discretion.

Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision.

Upon review, we will grant the motion and remand the matter for further proceedings.

Service Center Operations (SCOPS) denied the petition, concluding that the Petitioner did not establish that a waiver of the required job offer, and thus of a labor certification, would be in the national interest.

Service Center Operations (SCOPS) denied the petition, concluding that the Petitioner had not established eligibility for the underlying EB-2 visa classification and that a waiver of the required job offer, and thus of the labor certification, would be in the national interest.

Service Center Operations (SCOPS) denied the petition, concluding the Petitioner did not establish that a waiver of the job offer requirement, and thus of a labor certification, would be in the national interest.

Service Center Operations (SCOPS) denied the petition, concluding that the Petitioner did not establish eligibility for a national interest waiver.

Service Center Operations (SCOPS) denied the petition, concluding the Petitioner did not establish eligibility for the underlying immigrant classification or that, on balance, a waiver of the required job offer, and thus of the labor certification, would be in the national interest.

Service Center Operations (SCOPS) denied the petition, concluding that the Petitioner did not establish that a waiver of the required job offer, and thus of a labor certification, would be in the national interest.

Service Center Operations (SCOPS) denied the petition, concluding that the Petitioner did not establish that he merits a discretionary waiver of the EB-2 classification's job offer requirement.