PetitionLens

11 decisions

newest first
  1. RemandedNIW · Appeal2026-07-28
    Inorganic chemistJUL282026_06B5203
    Physical sciences & math

    Upon de novo review, we will withdraw our decision to sustain the appeal and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.

    Citation record not persuasiveNo interest from users, customers or investorsPlan or projections not corroboratedPast record does not show influence or success
  2. RemandedNIW · Appeal2026-07-16
    Postdoctoral fellow at the time of the petition's filingJUL162026_01B5203
    Engineering

    Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.

    Citation record not persuasiveJob creation or economic claims unsupportedSupport letters generic or unsupportedDid not show the waiver outweighs labor certificationPast record does not show influence or success
  3. RemandedNIW · Appeal2026-01-28
    Computer scientistJAN282026_07B5203
    Computing, AI & data

    Upon de novo review, we will withdraw SCOPS' decision and remand the matter for the entry of a new decision.

    Citation record not persuasiveArgued the field's importance, not the endeavor'sInconsistencies in the record
  4. RemandedNIW · Appeal2026-01-08
    Researcher in the field of computer scienceJAN082026_01B5203
    Computing, AI & data

    Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.

    Citation record not persuasiveNo broader implications shownPast record does not show influence or success
  5. RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-10-14
    Engineer and researcher in the green energy fieldOCT142025_02B5203
    Engineering

    Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.

    Citation record not persuasiveClaims not backed by documentsPast record does not show influence or success
  6. RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-07-02
    Civil engineerJUL022025_03B5203
    Engineering

    Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.

    Citation record not persuasivePast record does not show influence or success
  7. RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-05-27
    Occupation not statedMAY272025_03B5203
    Physical sciences & math

    Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.

    Citation record not persuasiveNo interest from users, customers or investorsDid not show the waiver outweighs labor certificationPast record does not show influence or success
  8. RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-05-14
    ExpertMAY142025_08B5203
    Engineering

    2 (AAO 2015), we conclude that a remand is warranted because SCOPS' decision is insufficient for review.

    Citation record not persuasiveJob creation or economic claims unsupportedDid not show the waiver outweighs labor certificationPast record does not show influence or success
  9. RemandedNIW · Appeal2021-06-28
    Materials scientistJUN282021_01B5203
    Physical sciences & math

    Upon de nova review, we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand the matter for the entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.

    Citation record not persuasivePast record does not show influence or success
  10. RemandedNIW · Appeal2014-04-22· old NYSDOT test
    Occupation not statedAPR222014_01B5203
    Physical sciences & math

    Because the petitioner has not established eligibility for the benefit sought, we will remand the petition for a new decision.

    Citation record not persuasiveInconsistencies in the record
  11. RemandedEB-2 · Appeal2013-12-12· old NYSDOT test
    Occupation not statedDEC122013_01B5203
    Computing, AI & data

    Thus, the petition will be remanded for the director to determine whether the beneficiary is a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, and that the offered position requires, at a minimum, a [p5] (b)(6) NON-PRECEDENT DECISION Page 5 professional holding an advanced degree.

    Citation record not persuasiveInconsistencies in the record