171 decisions
newest first- RemandedEB-2 · Appeal2025-11-20EngineerNOV202025_03B5203Engineering
Because SCOPS applied the incorrect classification to the petition, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision.
- RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-11-06Graduate student researcher in artificial intelligence (Al)NOV062025_01B5203Computing, AI & data
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Not eligible at the time of filingExceptional ability not establishedDid not show the waiver outweighs labor certification - RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-10-27Occupation not statedOCT272025_01B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw SCOPS' decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision.
Support letters generic or unsupportedNo broader implications shownDid not show the waiver outweighs labor certificationPast record does not show influence or success - RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-10-21Cloud solutions architectOCT212025_04B5203Computing, AI & data
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Job creation or economic claims unsupportedNo broader implications shownDid not show the waiver outweighs labor certificationPast record does not show influence or success - RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-10-17Electronics engineer in telecommunicationsOCT172025_02B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Tried to change the endeavor after filingDid not show the waiver outweighs labor certification - RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-10-14Engineer and researcher in the green energy fieldOCT142025_02B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Citation record not persuasiveClaims not backed by documentsPast record does not show influence or success - RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-10-01Research engineerOCT012025_08B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
- RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-09-24HealthSEP242025_02B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw SCOPS' decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision.
Benefits limited to an employer or its clientsProposed endeavor too vagueArgued the field's importance, not the endeavor'sSupport letters generic or unsupportedPast record does not show influence or success - RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-07-02Civil engineerJUL022025_03B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Citation record not persuasivePast record does not show influence or success - RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-06-26Software developer specializing in automotive safety engineeringJUN262025_04B5203Computing, AI & data
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw SCOPS' decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision.
No interest from users, customers or investorsNo urgency shownPast record does not show influence or success - RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-06-26Computer and information systems managerJUN262025_07B5203Computing, AI & data
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw SCOPS ' decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Exceptional ability not establishedInconsistencies in the record - RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-06-10Senior engineerJUN102025_05B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Inconsistencies in the recordLabor certification not shown to be impracticalDid not show the waiver outweighs labor certificationPast record does not show influence or success - RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-06-10Civil engineerJUN102025_07B5203Engineering
2 (AAO 2015), we conclude that a remand is warranted in this case because SCOPS ' decision is insufficient for review.
Inconsistencies in the record - RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-06-10Civil engineerJUN102025_08B5203Engineering
Upon de nova review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Inconsistencies in the record - RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-05-28Civil engineerMAY282025_05B5203Engineering
2 (AAO 2015), we conclude that a remand is warranted in this case because SCOPS' decision is insufficient for review.
Inconsistencies in the recordNo broader implications shownPast record does not show influence or success - RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-05-19Control engineerMAY192025_02B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw SCOPS's decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision.
Job creation or economic claims unsupportedNo urgency shownPast record does not show influence or success - RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-05-14ExpertMAY142025_08B5203Engineering
2 (AAO 2015), we conclude that a remand is warranted because SCOPS' decision is insufficient for review.
Citation record not persuasiveJob creation or economic claims unsupportedDid not show the waiver outweighs labor certificationPast record does not show influence or success - RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-05-12Civil engineerMAY122025_02B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Inconsistencies in the recordPast record does not show influence or success - RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-05-02Occupation not statedMAY022025_06B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
No broader implications shownDid not show the waiver outweighs labor certification - RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-04-28Computer scientistAPR282025_08B5203Computing, AI & data
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the SCOPS decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision.
Job creation or economic claims unsupportedNo broader implications shown