40 decisions
newest first- RemandedNIW · Appeal2026-01-28Computer scientistJAN282026_07B5203Computing, AI & data
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw SCOPS' decision and remand the matter for the entry of a new decision.
Citation record not persuasiveArgued the field's importance, not the endeavor'sInconsistencies in the record - RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-06-26Computer and information systems managerJUN262025_07B5203Computing, AI & data
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw SCOPS ' decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Exceptional ability not establishedInconsistencies in the record - RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-06-10Senior engineerJUN102025_05B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Inconsistencies in the recordLabor certification not shown to be impracticalDid not show the waiver outweighs labor certificationPast record does not show influence or success - RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-06-10Civil engineerJUN102025_07B5203Engineering
2 (AAO 2015), we conclude that a remand is warranted in this case because SCOPS ' decision is insufficient for review.
Inconsistencies in the record - RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-06-10Civil engineerJUN102025_08B5203Engineering
Upon de nova review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Inconsistencies in the record - RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-05-28Civil engineerMAY282025_05B5203Engineering
2 (AAO 2015), we conclude that a remand is warranted in this case because SCOPS' decision is insufficient for review.
Inconsistencies in the recordNo broader implications shownPast record does not show influence or success - RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-05-12Civil engineerMAY122025_02B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Inconsistencies in the recordPast record does not show influence or success - RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-01-21EngineerJAN212025_10B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Inconsistencies in the recordNo interest from users, customers or investorsPast record does not show influence or success - RemandedNIW · Appeal2024-07-26Environmental engineerJUL262024_06B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Proposed endeavor too vagueInconsistencies in the recordSupport letters generic or unsupportedNo interest from users, customers or investorsNo urgency shown - RemandedNIW · Appeal2024-04-02Computer network and maintenance technicianAPR022024_03B5203Computing, AI & data
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Inconsistencies in the record - RemandedNIW · Appeal2024-02-08Project manager in information technology and telecommunications systemsFEB082024_08B5203Computing, AI & data
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the Acting Director's decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Inconsistencies in the recordDid not show the waiver outweighs labor certification - RemandedNIW · Appeal2024-01-12Civil engineerJAN122024_06B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Inconsistencies in the record - RemandedEB-2 · Motion to reopen2023-07-21Software development companyJUL212023_01B5203Computing, AI & data
[p2] the motion to reopen, withdraw the Director's decision, and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Five years of progressive experience not documentedInconsistencies in the record - RemandedNIW · Appeal2023-04-04Entrepreneur in the field of distance education with a focus on information technologyAPR042023_01B5203Computing, AI & data
Upondenovoreview, we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Not eligible at the time of filingExceptional ability not establishedInconsistencies in the recordSupport letters generic or unsupportedPast record does not show influence or success - RemandedEB-2 · Appeal2023-03-08Information technology businessMAR082023_01B5203Computing, AI & data
Upon de nova review, we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Inconsistencies in the recordTried to change the endeavor after filing - RemandedEB-2 · Certification2022-08-26Software services companyAUG262022_01B5203Computing, AI & data
4(a)(l), which provides that decisions by field office or service center directors may be certified 1 Upon de nova review, we will remand the case to the Director for further consideration and the issuance of a new decision.
Inconsistencies in the record - RemandedNIW · Appeal2021-06-21Occupation not statedJUN212021_03B5203Computing, AI & data
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand the matter for further review of the record and issuance of a new decision.
Inconsistencies in the record - RemandedEB-2 · Appeal2021-03-23Big data engineerMAR232021_01B5203Computing, AI & data
Upon de nova review, we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision.
Not eligible at the time of filingInconsistencies in the record - RemandedEB-2 · Appeal2021-01-25IT consulting companyJAN252021_01B5203Computing, AI & data
Upon de nova review, we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand the case for further consideration and the issuance of a new decision.
Five years of progressive experience not documentedInconsistencies in the record - RemandedEB-2 · Motion to reconsider2021-01-05Developer of software for online advertisingJAN052021_02B5203Computing, AI & data
Upon de nova review, we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Inconsistencies in the recordLabor certification not shown to be impractical