781 decisions
newest first- SustainedEB-2 · Motion to reconsider2018-02-08Designer and marketer of semiconductor chipsFEB082018_03B5203Engineering
- SustainedEB-2 · Appeal2018-01-12Director of engineeringJAN122018_01B5203Engineering
- DismissedNIW · Appeal2017-12-14Occupation not statedDEC142017_01B5203Engineering
and that he had not established that a waiver of the required job otTer.
Proposed endeavor too vagueNo broader implications shown - DismissedNIW · Appeal2017-12-12Aerospace engineerDEC122017_02B5203Engineering
The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the Form I-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker, finding that the Petitioner qualified for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, but that he had not established that a waiver of the required job offer, and thus of the labor certification, would be in the national interest.
Benefits limited to an employer or its clientsNo broader implications shownNo interest from users, customers or investorsPast record does not show influence or success - DismissedEB-2 · Appeal2017-11-28ManufacturerNOV282017_01B5203Engineering
The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the petition, concluding that based on the issuance date of the Beneficiary's bachelor's degree diploma, the Beneficiary could not show.
Degree not shown to be a U.S. advanced degree equivalentFive years of progressive experience not documentedInconsistencies in the record - DismissedEB-2 · Appeal2017-10-04Tire manufacturing businessOCT042017_02B5203Engineering
The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the Beneficiary did not meet the experience requirements of the labor certification or the EB-2 classification.
Degree not shown to be a U.S. advanced degree equivalent - DismissedNIW · Appeal2017-08-21Metallurgical engineerAUG212017_01B5203Engineering
The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the Form 1-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker, finding that the Petitioner qualified for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, but that she had not established that a waiver of the required job offer, and thus of the labor certification, would be in the national interest.
Claims not backed by documentsProposed endeavor too vagueInconsistencies in the recordLabor certification not shown to be impracticalNo broader implications shown+2 more - DismissedEB-2 · Appeal2017-08-15Civil engineerAUG152017_02B5203Engineering
- SustainedEB-2 · Appeal2017-07-26Vehicle manufacturerJUL262017_03B5203Engineering
Accordingly, the Petitioner has established eligibility for the benefit sought.
- DismissedEB-2 · Motion to reopen2017-04-21Manufacturer of oil field equipmentAPR212017_01B5203Engineering
The Director determined that the Petitioner had not established its ability to pay the proffered wage from the priority date onward.
Citation record not persuasiveInconsistencies in the recordNo interest from users, customers or investors - DismissedEB-2 · Appeal2017-01-18Industrial textile manufacturerJAN182017_02B5203Engineering
- DismissedEB-2 · Motion to reopen2016-12-21· old NYSDOT testVice president of engineering servicesDEC212016_01B5203Engineering
The Director found that the Petitioner did not establish that the Beneficiary had the requisite educational degree to qualify for the job offered, and also did not establish its ability to pay the proffered wage of the job offered.
Claims not backed by documents - SustainedNIW · Appeal2016-12-12· old NYSDOT testCorrosion science engineerDEC122016_01B5203Engineering
· Thus, the rem~iriing issue in contention is ~hether the Petitioner has established that a waiver of the job offer requirement, and thus a labor certification, is in the national interest according to the three-pronged analysis set forth inNYSDOT.
Citation record not persuasiveArgued the field's importance, not the endeavor's - DismissedEB-2 · Appeal2016-12-05· old NYSDOT testOperator of automotive dealershipsDEC052016_01B5203Engineering
The Director concluded that the record did not establish the Beneficiary's possession of the educational credentials required for the offered position and the requested classification.
Degree not shown to be a U.S. advanced degree equivalent - DismissedNIW · Appeal2016-08-22· old NYSDOT testAerospace engineerAUG222016_01B5203Engineering
He found that the Petitioner did not establish that a waiver of the job offer requirement is in the national interest.
Tried to change the endeavor after filingEvidence submitted too late - SustainedNIW · Appeal2016-07-28· old NYSDOT testPetroleum geomechanics engineerJUL282016_01B5203Engineering
Therefore, on the basis of the evidence submitted, the Petitioner has established that a waiver of the requirement of a job offer, and thus of a labor certification, will be in the national interest of the United States.
Argued the field's importance, not the endeavor's - SustainedNIW · Appeal2016-07-06· old NYSDOT testSenior engineer working on wireless communications technologyJUL062016_01B5203Engineering
The Petitioner in this case has established by a preponderance of the evidence that he qualifies as an advanced degree professional, and that a waiver of the job offer requirement will be in the national interest of the United States.
Argued the field's importance, not the endeavor'sSupport letters generic or unsupportedPast record does not show influence or success - DismissedEB-2 · Certification2016-02-09· old NYSDOT testElectrical contractorFEB092016_07B5203Engineering
The Director determined that the Beneficiary did not qualify for classification as an advanced degree professional under section 203(b )(2) of the Act, or meet the minimum requirements on the labor certification to qualify for the job offered.
Claims not backed by documentsFive years of progressive experience not documented - SustainedEB-2 · Appeal2015-12-29· old NYSDOT testMotor manufacturerDEC292015_02B5203Engineering
- MotionNIW · Motion to reopen2015-08-25· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedAUG252015_01B5203Engineering
The director found that the petitioner has not established that he qualifies for classification as an alien of exceptional ability, and therefore declined to make a determination as to whether an exemption from the requirement of a job offer would be in the national interest of the United States.
Not eligible at the time of filingExceptional ability not establishedSupport letters generic or unsupported