64 decisions
newest first- RemandedNIW · Appeal2026-07-16Postdoctoral fellow at the time of the petition's filingJUL162026_01B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Citation record not persuasiveJob creation or economic claims unsupportedSupport letters generic or unsupportedDid not show the waiver outweighs labor certificationPast record does not show influence or success - RemandedNIW · Appeal2026-06-04Semiconductor technology researcherJUN042026_01B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Proposed endeavor too vagueLabor certification not shown to be impracticalPast record does not show influence or success - RemandedEB-2 · Appeal2026-05-27Semiconductor manufacturerMAY272026_03B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
- RemandedNIW · Appeal2026-05-08Manufacturer of programmable logic devicesMAY082026_02B5203Engineering
We will therefore withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
- RemandedNIW · Appeal2026-05-05Manufacturing optimization consultantMAY052026_01B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw SCOPS' decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Degree not shown to be a U.S. advanced degree equivalentFive years of progressive experience not documented - RemandedEB-2 · Appeal2026-03-11QA automation testerMAR112026_02B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Five years of progressive experience not documented - RemandedNIW · Appeal2026-02-06Transportation engineerFEB062026_03B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Job creation or economic claims unsupportedPlan or projections not corroboratedDid not show the waiver outweighs labor certification - RemandedNIW · Appeal2026-02-03Electrical engineerFEB032026_03B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Not eligible at the time of filingBenefits limited to an employer or its clientsNo broader implications shown - RemandedEB-2 · Appeal2025-12-18EngineerDEC182025_01B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Degree not shown to be a U.S. advanced degree equivalent - RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-11-25Nanofabrication engineering specialistNOV252025_04B5203Engineering
We will therefore withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Job creation or economic claims unsupported - RemandedEB-2 · Appeal2025-11-20EngineerNOV202025_03B5203Engineering
Because SCOPS applied the incorrect classification to the petition, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision.
- RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-10-27Occupation not statedOCT272025_01B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw SCOPS' decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision.
Support letters generic or unsupportedNo broader implications shownDid not show the waiver outweighs labor certificationPast record does not show influence or success - RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-10-17Electronics engineer in telecommunicationsOCT172025_02B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Tried to change the endeavor after filingDid not show the waiver outweighs labor certification - RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-10-14Engineer and researcher in the green energy fieldOCT142025_02B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Citation record not persuasiveClaims not backed by documentsPast record does not show influence or success - RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-10-01Research engineerOCT012025_08B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
- RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-09-24HealthSEP242025_02B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw SCOPS' decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision.
Benefits limited to an employer or its clientsProposed endeavor too vagueArgued the field's importance, not the endeavor'sSupport letters generic or unsupportedPast record does not show influence or success - RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-07-02Civil engineerJUL022025_03B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Citation record not persuasivePast record does not show influence or success - RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-06-10Senior engineerJUN102025_05B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Inconsistencies in the recordLabor certification not shown to be impracticalDid not show the waiver outweighs labor certificationPast record does not show influence or success - RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-06-10Civil engineerJUN102025_07B5203Engineering
2 (AAO 2015), we conclude that a remand is warranted in this case because SCOPS ' decision is insufficient for review.
Inconsistencies in the record - RemandedNIW · Appeal2025-06-10Civil engineerJUN102025_08B5203Engineering
Upon de nova review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Inconsistencies in the record