1,713 decisions
newest first- DismissedEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-02-28· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB282013_03B5203Computing, AI & data
" The Director concluded that the ·petitioner failed to show where the beneficiary would be working, misrepresented material fac_ts with regard to the beneficiary's place of intended employment, and eommitted fraud on the petition and supporting documentation.
- DismissedEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-02-28· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB282013_04B5203Computing, AI & data
Upon reviewing the petition, the director· determined that · the beneficiary did not satisfy the minimum level of education stated on the labor certification.
Degree not shown to be a U.S. advanced degree equivalentFive years of progressive experience not documented - RejectedEB-2 · Appeal2013-02-27· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB272013_03B5203Law & policy
- DismissedEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-02-21· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB212013_03B5203Computing, AI & data
The director determined that the evidence did not establish that the beneficiary possessed either a bachelor's or master's degree in the •major field listed on the ·ETA Form.
- RejectedEB-2 · Other2013-02-21· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB212013_05B5203Law & policy
- DismissedEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-02-21· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB212013_06B5203Computing, AI & data
The director determined that the ETA ·Form 9089 failed to demonstrate that the job requires a professional holding an advanced degree and, therefore, the beneficiary cannot be found qualified for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree.
- DismissedNIW · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-02-20· old NYSDOT testEngineer scientistFEB202013_04B5203Engineering
The director found that the petitioner qualifies for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, but that the petitioner has not established that an exemption from the requirement of a job offer would be in the national interest of the United States.
Citation record not persuasiveClaims not backed by documentsNo interest from users, customers or investors - SustainedNIW · Appeal2013-02-19· old NYSDOT testPostdoctoral associateFEB192013_02B5203Law & policy
The sole issue in contention is whether the petitioner has established that a waiver of the job offer requirement, and thus a labor certification, is in the national interest.
Citation record not persuasiveSupport letters generic or unsupportedNo interest from users, customers or investorsPast record does not show influence or success - DismissedEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-02-19· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB192013_04B5203Engineering
Upon reviewing the petition, the director determined that the beneficiary did not qualify for the second preference classification and that the beneficiary did meet the job qualifications stated on the alien employment certification before the priority date.
Not eligible at the time of filingFive years of progressive experience not documentedInconsistencies in the recordSupport letters generic or unsupported - RejectedEB-2 · Other2013-02-19· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB192013_05B5203Law & policy
not established that the beneficiary will work at the location specified on the labor certification or that the job offer at that location was valid.
- DismissedNIW · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-02-19· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB192013_07B5203Law & policy
The director also found that the petitioner has not established that an exemption from the requirement of a job offer would be in the national interest ofthe United States.
Citation record not persuasiveClaims not backed by documentsArgued the field's importance, not the endeavor'sInconsistencies in the recordSupport letters generic or unsupported+2 more - DismissedNIW · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-02-15· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB152013_01B5203Computing, AI & data
The director found that the petitioner qualifies for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, but that the petitioner has not established that an exemption from the requirement of a job offer would be in the national interest ofthe United States.
Claims not backed by documentsArgued the field's importance, not the endeavor'sNo interest from users, customers or investors - RejectedEB-2 · Appeal2013-02-14· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB142013_01B5203Law & policy
The director found that the · petitioner qualifies for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, but that the petitioner had not established that an exemption from the requirement of a job offer would be in the national interestof the United States.
- MotionEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-02-12· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB122013_04B5203Computing, AI & data
Upon reviewing the petition, the director detennined that the beneficiary did not satisfy the minimum level of education stated on the alien employment certification.
Claims not backed by documentsDegree not shown to be a U.S. advanced degree equivalentFive years of progressive experience not documented - WithdrawnEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-02-12· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB122013_05B5203Computing, AI & data
Therefore, it does not qualify as an advanced degree within the meaning of 8 C.
- RejectedEB-2 · Other2013-02-12· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB122013_06B5203Law & policy
Upon reviewing the petition, the director determined that the beneficiary did not satisfy the minimum .
- SustainedEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-02-04· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB042013_01B5203Computing, AI & data
- DismissedEB-2 · Motion to reconsider2013-02-01· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB012013_03B5203Engineering
The director determined that the ETA Form 9089 failed to demonstrate that the job requires a professional holding an advanced.
Claims not backed by documents - UnknownNIW · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-02-01· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedFEB012013_11B5203Law & policy
The director found that the petitioner qualifies for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, but that the petitioner has not established that an exemption from the requirement of a job offer would be in the national interest of the United States.
Citation record not persuasiveClaims not backed by documentsNo interest from users, customers or investors - DismissedEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-01-31· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedJAN312013_01B5203Engineering
The director determined that the ETA Form 9089 failed to demonstrate that the job requires a professional · holding an advanced degree and, therefore, the beneficiary cannot be found qualified for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree.