PetitionLens
All decisions
DismissedEB-2 · Appeal

Occupation not stated

Other / unclear · decided 2013-08-09 · NSC · AUG092013_01B5203

Official PDF on uscis.gov

Decided under the old NYSDOT test, replaced by Matter of Dhanasar on Dec 27, 2016. Useful for background only.

How each part of the test was decided

Read from the appeals office's own sentences by fixed rules, not from the Director's findings or the petitioner's arguments. Each result shows the sentence it came from. The official PDF controls.

  • Step 0Eligible for EB-2Not decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

The decision in brief

Sentences picked out of the text automatically. Read them in context below; the official PDF controls.

Summary sentence

The director determined that the petitioner had not established that it had the continuing ability to pay the beneficiary the proffered wage beginning on the priority date of the visa petition and denied the petition accordingly. See in text

What the AAO decided

  • The appeal will be dismissed as moot. See in text
  • ORDER: The appeal is dismissed based on the alien's adjustment to lawful permanent resident status. See in text
Read the full decision (2 pages)

Objections found (0)

Automated tags. Each shows the sentence that triggered it.

No catalog objection was detected in the analysis section.

    Full decision

    OCR text from the official PDF, reformatted for reading. Scan errors carry over; the PDF controls.

    Highlighted: Outcome (2)Matter of X citation
    Decision header
    DATEAUG 0 9 2013 OFFICE: NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER · INRE: Petitioner: · Beneficiary: U.S. Department of Homeland Security U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Administr ative Appeals Office (AAO) 20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., MS 2090 Washington , DC 20529-2090 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services FILE : · PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as a Member of the Professions Holding an Advanced

    Degree or an Alien of Exceptional Ability Pursuant to Section 203(b )(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2)

    ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER:

    INSTRUCTIONS:

    Enclosed please find the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) in your case. Rosenb erg

    Acting Chief, Administrative Appeals Office www.uscis.gov

    NON-PRECEDENT DECISION

    DISCUSSION: The Director, Nebraska Service Center, denied the immigrant visa petition and the matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be dismissed as moot.

    The petitioner is a water resource engineering consulting service. It seeks to employ the beneficiary permanently in the United States as an associate professional. On the Form 1-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker, the petitioner requested classification of the beneficiary as an advanced degree professional pursuant to section 203(b)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U .S.C. § 1153(b )(2). The director determined that the petitioner had not established that it had the continuing ability to pay the beneficiary the proffered wage beginning on the priority date of the visa petition and denied the petition accordingly.

    Review of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) records indicates that, subsequent to filing the instant petition, the alien filed a Form I-485 Application to Adjust Status, receipt number which was approved on June 24, 2013. Because the alien has adjusted to lawful permanent resident status, further pursuit of the matter at hand is moot.

    ORDER: The appeal is dismissed based on the alien's adjustment to lawful permanent resident status.