PetitionLens
Log inGet started
All decisions
DismissedEB-2 · Other

Occupation not stated

Other / unclear · decided 2013-01-28 · NSC · JAN282013_06B5203

Official PDF on uscis.gov

Decided under the old NYSDOT test, replaced by Matter of Dhanasar on Dec 27, 2016. Useful for background only.

How each part of the test was decided

Read from the appeals office's own sentences by fixed rules, not from the Director's findings or the petitioner's arguments. Each result shows the sentence it came from. The official PDF controls.

  • Step 0Eligible for EB-2Not decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

The decision in brief

Sentences picked out of the text automatically. Read them in context below; the official PDF controls.

What the AAO decided

  • ORDER: The appeal is dismissed based on the approval of the underlying petition. See in text
Read the full decision (1 page)

Objections found (0)

Automated tags. Each shows the sentence that triggered it.

No catalog objection was detected in the analysis section.

    Full decision

    OCR text from the official PDF, reformatted for reading. Scan errors carry over; the PDF controls.

    Highlighted: Outcome (1)Matter of X citation
    Decision header
    DATEJAN 2 8 201]}FFICE: NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER · IN RE: Petitioner: · Beneficiary: U.S. Department of Homeland Security U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) - 20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., MS 2090 Washington, DC 20529-2090 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services FILE: · PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as a Member of the Professions Holding an

    Advanced Degree or an Alien of Exceptional 'Ability Pursuant to Section 203(b )(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2) ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER:

    INSTRUCTIONS:

    Enclosed please find the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) \~ you_r case. All of the documents related to this matter have been returned to the office that originally deCided your case. Please be advised that any further inquiry that you might have concerning your case must be made to that office. DISCUSSION: The visa petition was initially denied by the Director, Nebraska Service Center. The petitioner filed a Form I-290B, which was treated as a motion by the Director. The matter was also appealed to the AAO. On January 12, 2012, the petition was approved on motion, which renders the separate appeal before the AAO moot.

    ORDER: The appeal is dismissed based on the approval of the underlying petition.

    {1rf{)u,

    ~H~nberg

    Acting Chief, Administrative Appeals Office