2,001 decisions

The director determined that the petitioner had not established that it had the continuing ability to pay the beneficiary the proffered wage beginning on the priority date of the visa petition.

Upon reviewing the petition, the director determined that the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the beneficiary satisfied the minimum level of education required by the labor certification.

3 The AAO's decisions dismissing the appeal and the subsequent motion conclude that the beneficiary's education does not meet the minimum requirements of the labor certification or the requested immigrant visa preference classification.

A motion that does not meet applicable requirements shall be dismissed.

The director's decision denying the petition concluded that the beneficiary did not satisfy the minimum educational requirements of the offered position and the requested preference classification.

Upon reviewing the petition, the director determined that the beneficiary did not satisfy the minimum level of education stated on the labor certification.

Upon reviewing the petition, the director determined that the beneficiary did not satisfy the minimum level of education required by the terms of the labor certification.

Upon reviewing the petition, the director determined that the beneficiary did not satisfy the minimum level of education stated on the labor certification or as required by the advanced degree professional classification.

Upon reviewing the petition, the director determined that the beneficiary did not satisfy the minimum level of education stated on the labor certification.

2 Upon reviewing the petition, the acting director determined that the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary possessed the minimum .

The director determined that the beneficiary did not satisfy the minimum level of education stated on the labor certification .

· Upon reviewing the petition, the director determined that the beneficiary did not satisfy the minimum level of education stated on the labor certification or as required by the advanced degree professional classification.

Upon reviewing the petition, the director determined that the beneficiary did not satisfy the minimum level of education stated on the labor certification.

Upon reviewing the petition, the director determined that the beneficiary did not satisfy the minimuin level of education stated on the labor certification or as required by the advanced degree professional classification.

Upon reviewing the petition, the director determined that the beneficiary did not satisfy the minimum level of education stated on the labor certification.

Upon rev)ewing the petition, the director determined that the beneficiary did not satisfy the minimum level of education stated on the labor certification or as required by the advanced degree professional classification.

The director determined that the petitioner had not established that it had the continuing ability to pay the beneficiary the proffered wage beginning on the priority date of the visa petition.

that the beneficiary did not satisfy the minimum level of education stated on the labor certification or as required by the advanced degree professional classification.

master's degree, he is not eligible for classification as an advanced degree professional, and cannot qualify for the proffered position under the terms of the labor certification, based solely on his education.

[p3] (b)(6) Page 3 On April 26, 2012, the AAO issued a Notice of Intent to Deny and Request for Evidence (NOID!RFE), indicating that it intended to withdraw the Director's recommended approval of the petition because the record did not establish that the beneficiary's Indian education is equivalent to a -U.