1,135 decisions

The Acting Associate Director of Service Center Operations concluded that the Petitioner did not demonstrate its required ability to pay the offered job's proffered wage.

The Acting Associate Director of Service Center Operations concluded that the Petitioner did not demonstrate its required ability to pay the offered job's proffered wage.

We will therefore withdraw SCOPS' decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.

Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.

SCOPS concluded the Petitioner did not establish that it had the ability to pay the Beneficiary's proffered wage from the priority date through to the time he obtains permanent residence.

We will therefore withdraw SCOPS' decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.

But SCOPS concluded that the Petitioner did not demonstrate the Beneficiary's qualifications for designation as an alien of "exceptional ability" under the U.

Service Center Operations (SCOPS) denied the petition, concluding that the Petitioner did not demonstrate the Beneficiary's qualifications for Schedule A designation as a physical therapist.

We will therefore withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.

Upon review, we will grant the motion and remand the matter for further proceedings.

Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.

We will therefore withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.

Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.

SCOPS concluded that the Petitioner did not demonstrate the Beneficiary's qualifying education for the offered job because her master's degree is not in an accepted field of study.

Because SCOPS applied the incorrect classification to the petition, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision.

Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.

Service Center Operations (SCOPS) denied the petition, concluding that the Petitioner did not establish that the Beneficiary possessed the required education for the offered position as described on the accompanying certification from the U.

SCOPS denied the petition, concluding that the record did not establish the Petitioner bas a one-time achievement (that is, a major internationally-recognized award) or meets at least three of the ten evidentiary criteria at 8 C.