70 decisions
newest first- DeniedNIW · Certification2025-03-03Semi-truck driverMAR032025_01B5203Aviation & transport
The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the petition, concluding the Petitioner had not established eligibility for the EB-2 immigrant classification as an individual of exceptional ability.
Degree not shown to be a U.S. advanced degree equivalentFive years of progressive experience not documentedInconsistencies in the recordSupport letters generic or unsupported - RejectedEB-2 · Appeal2023-03-02Provider of software development and other information technology servicesMAR022023_02B5203Computing, AI & data
The Director concluded that the Petitioner did not establish itself as the "successor in interest" of the employer listed on the accompanying certification from the U.
Evidence submitted too late - RejectedEB-2 · Appeal2022-01-27Provider of management servicesJAN272022_02B5203Business & finance
- RejectedEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2020-10-16Marketing directorOCT162020_02B5203Business & finance
The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the petition and a subsequent motion to reconsider, concluding that the record did not establish that the Beneficiary possessed a bachelor's degree in a field of study required for the offered position.
- RejectedEB-2 · Appeal2020-09-03Montessori schoolSEP032020_05B5203Other / unclear
Since the Petitioner is no longer doing business, it cannot establish its continuing ability to pay the proffered wage under 8 C.
- DeniedNIW · Certification2016-12-02· old NYSDOT testScience teacherDEC022016_02B5203Education
The Director found that the Petitioner qualified for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, but that he had not established that a waiver of a job offer would be in the national interest.
Argued the field's importance, not the endeavor'sNo interest from users, customers or investorsPast record does not show influence or successRelied on a labor shortage - DeniedNIW · Motion to reopen2015-08-21· old NYSDOT testBusiness development managerAUG212015_02B5203Business & finance
The director denied the Form I-140 on October 11, 2013, finding that the petitioner established her qualifications as an individual of exceptional ability and an advanced degree professional, but did not establish that an exemption from the requirement of a job offer would be in the national interest of the United States.
Argued the field's importance, not the endeavor'sNo interest from users, customers or investorsPast record does not show influence or success - DeniedNIW · Motion to reopen & reconsider2015-04-29· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedAPR292015_01B5203Education
The director found that the petitioner qualifies for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, but that the petitioner has not established that an exemption from the requirement of a job offer would be in the national interest of the United States.
Argued the field's importance, not the endeavor'sNo interest from users, customers or investorsPast record does not show influence or success - DeniedNIW · Motion to reopen & reconsider2014-12-29· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedDEC292014_01B5203Business & finance
A motion that does not meet applicable requirements shall be dismissed.
Claims not backed by documentsPast record does not show influence or success - DeniedNIW · Motion to reopen & reconsider2014-11-28· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedNOV282014_03B5203Law & policy
The director denied the petition on December 12, 2013, stating that the petitioner qualifies for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, but that the petitioner has not established that an exemption from the requirement of a job offer would be in the national interest of the United States.
Argued the field's importance, not the endeavor'sNo interest from users, customers or investorsPast record does not show influence or success - DeniedEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2014-08-14· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedAUG142014_03B5203Computing, AI & data
The director's certified decision denied the petition, finding that the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary possessed a U.
Claims not backed by documentsDegree not shown to be a U.S. advanced degree equivalentInconsistencies in the record - DeniedNIW · Motion to reopen & reconsider2014-05-27· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedMAY272014_01B5203Business & finance
The director found that the petitioner qualifies for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, but that the petitioner has not established that an exemption from the requirement of a job offer would be in the national interest of the United States.
Citation record not persuasiveClaims not backed by documentsDegree not shown to be a U.S. advanced degree equivalentArgued the field's importance, not the endeavor'sInconsistencies in the record+3 more - DeniedNIW · Motion to reopen & reconsider2014-04-16· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedAPR162014_01B5203Law & policy
The director denied the petition on November 19, 2012, stating that the petitioner qualifies for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, but that the petitioner has not established that an exemption from the requirement of a job offer would be in the national interest of the United States.
Citation record not persuasiveClaims not backed by documentsNo interest from users, customers or investorsPast record does not show influence or success - DeniedEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2014-04-09· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedAPR092014_04B5203Education
The Director, Texas Service Center, denied the petition concluding that the beneficiary 1) does not qualify as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, (2) that the petitioner had not established its ability to pay the beneficiary's wage and (3) that the petitioner had not established that the offered position constitutes permanent employment.
Degree not shown to be a U.S. advanced degree equivalent - DeniedEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2014-04-09· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedAPR092014_05B5203Education
The Director, Texas Service Center, denied the petition concluding that the beneficiary 1) does not qualify as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, (2) that the petitioner had not established its ability to pay the beneficiary's wage and (3) that the petitioner had not established that the offered position constitutes permanent employment.
Degree not shown to be a U.S. advanced degree equivalent - DeniedNIW · Motion to reopen & reconsider2014-01-09· old NYSDOT testPhysicianJAN092014_06B5203Clinical & health
The director found that the petitioner qualified for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, but that the petitioner had not established that an exemption from the requirement of a job offer would be in the national interest of the United States.
Argued the field's importance, not the endeavor'sNo interest from users, customers or investorsPast record does not show influence or success - RejectedEB-2 · Certification2013-12-05· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedDEC052013_05B5203Business & finance
Therefore, the copies of the beneficiary's payroll records do not establish the petitioner's ability to pay his proffered wage in 201 L.
- RejectedEB-2 · Motion to reopen2013-11-27· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedNOV272013_08B5203Other / unclear
The director determined that the late appeal did not meet the requirements of a motion and forwarded the matter to the AAO.
- RejectedEB-2 · Appeal2013-11-26· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedNOV262013_01B5203Other / unclear
The director determined that the late appeal did not meet the requirements of a motion and forwarded the matter to the AAO.
- DeniedEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2013-11-22· old NYSDOT testOccupation not statedNOV222013_04B5203Other / unclear
In the Notice of Certification dated September 5, 2013, the director determined that the petitioner had not established that it had the continuing ability to pay the beneficiary the proffered wage beginning on the priority date of the visa petition, and that the petitioner had failed to establish that the beneficiary had met the minimum education, training or experience requirements as of the priority date.
Inconsistencies in the record